# Why gmail.com DMARC policy is still "none"?

**URL:** <https://forum.dmarcian.com/t/why-gmail-com-dmarc-policy-is-still-none/2464>\
**Category:** Community Area\
**Created:** [May 14, 2024, 12:18am UTC](https://forum.dmarcian.com/t/why-gmail-com-dmarc-policy-is-still-none/2464 "2024-05-14T00:18:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OtsukaCG](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.dmarcian.com/otsukacg/32/157_2.png) [@OtsukaCG](https://forum.dmarcian.com/u/OtsukaCG)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2024, 12:18am UTC](https://forum.dmarcian.com/t/why-gmail-com-dmarc-policy-is-still-none/2464/1 "2024-05-14T00:18:57Z")

</div>

I thought Google is one the organizations pusing adaptations of DMARC.  
But I’ve been wondering why [gmail.com](http://gmail.com)’s DMARC policy is “none”.  
Here is [gmail.com](http://gmail.com)’s dmarc record.

> v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=quarantine; [rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com](mailto:rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com)

They enable quarantime for subdomain, but none for parent domain.  
Does anyone know why?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LinkP](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.dmarcian.com/linkp/32/142_2.png) [@LinkP](https://forum.dmarcian.com/u/LinkP)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2024, 1:48am UTC](https://forum.dmarcian.com/t/why-gmail-com-dmarc-policy-is-still-none/2464/2 "2024-05-14T01:48:57Z")

</div>

You should probably ask Google that question. No one at dmarcian sets Google policy.